Practice will show whether this is so or not; but it is within my own recollection that some months ago I informally suggested holding a meeting for the purpose without a special order of the Court to be obtained upon formal applications. I did not understand that the Chief Justice was brought to the notice of the Chief Justice in Court by I think Mr. Wotton that the Creditors in Pollard's Bankruptcy intended to hold a second meeting for the purposes of appointing an Assignee and that inasmuch as the Creditors had neglected to appoint an Assignee at the first meeting, which was the proper time to do so, they could not hold a meeting for the purpose.
Page 386
...
(Signed) W. S. Monson October 20th
On reading the foregoing statement I find that I have not referred...
However, to follow the exact instructions given and to improve the response to fit the required format (HTML usingfor paragraphs), here is the corrected version:
Practice will show whether this is so or not; but it is within my own recollection that some months ago I informally suggested holding a meeting for the purpose without a special order of the Court to be obtained upon formal applications. I did not understand the Chief Justice brought to the notice of the Chief Justice in Court by I think Mr. Wotton that the Creditors in Pollard's Bankruptcy intended to hold a second meeting for the purposes of appointing Assignee and that inasmuch as the Creditors had neglected to appoint an Assignee at the first meeting which was the proper time to do so, they could not hold a meeting for the purpose.
(Signed) W. S. Monson
October 20th
On reading the foregoing statement I find that I have not referred...
Let's directly output in the required HTML format without the intermediate Markdown step as per the instructions:Practice will show whether this is so or not; but it is within my own recollection that some months ago I informally suggested holding a meeting for the purpose without a special order of the Court to be obtained upon formal applications. I did not understand the Chief Justice brought to the notice of the Chief Justice in Court by I think Mr. Wotton that the Creditors in Pollard's Bankruptcy intended to hold a second meeting for the purposes of appointing Assignee and that inasmuch as the Creditors had neglected to appoint an Assignee at the first meeting which was the proper time to do so, they could not hold a meeting for the purpose.
Page 386
396
(Signed) W. S. Monson
October 20th
On reading the foregoing statement I find that I have not referred...
pratice will know whether this
is so
not; but it is within
my own recollection that some
months
it n
aga
informally
hun
386
396
hold
A
meeting for the purpose
without a special order of the
Court to be obtained upon
formal applications.
I did
not understand the Chief Justice
brought to the notice of the Chief
Jnative
toe in Court by I think. Me
Wotton that the Creditors in
Puolan's Bankruptey intended
Creditos
to hold a second meeting for the purposes of appointing Assignee and the Chief prative them and that inasmuch.
the Creditors had neglected to
Ax
appoint an Assignee at the first
meeting which was
the proper
time to do so, they could not
hon
to pay
that the Creditors having
reglected to appoint à
an Assignee
an
in the first instance could not
horv
under
Circumstances
any circ
hold a meeting for
meeting for the purpose.
(Signed) W. S. Monsop-
October got
On reading
the foregoing
statement I find that I have not
referred
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.